Despite
the divergent views about the existence of the infallible pontifical teaching
in the encyclical letters, there is one point on which all theologians are
manifestly in agreement. They are all convinced that all Catholics are bound in
conscience to give a definite internal religious assent to those doctrines
which the Holy Father teaches when he speaks to the universal Church of God on
earth without employing his God-given charism of infallibility. Thus,
prescinding from the question as to whether any individual encyclical or group
of encyclicals may be said to contain specifically infallible teaching, all
theologians are in agreement that this religious assent must be accorded the
teachings which the Sovereign Pontiff includes in these documents. This assent
is due, as Lercher has noted, until the Church might choose to modify the
teaching previously presented or until proportionately serious reasons for
abandoning the non-infallible teaching contained in a pontifical document might
appear. [59] It goes without saying that any reason which would justify the
relinquishing of a position taken in a pontifical statement would have to be
very serious indeed.
How would you know if the Pope ‘s encyclical this Thursday were to come via a special revelation, that is, direct from the divine clouds or from some Hadron atom splitting eighth dimension. How would we
know it, he speaks general truths all the time, admonishing, encouraging, the
Dalai Lama does the same thing. But what
if this Thursday the words the world reads actually do come, direct, from
God, for us, today?
Would it, could it, be considered a new
revelation? Of course. And we'd know it. If it's the same old
same old and he has just jazzed things up with new adjectives and so forth, how and why would anyone expect to listen?
How and why would anyone expect to act, save the planet, lets go and reclaim the forest and the sea and the
deserts, nature is divine, he says, and we have been exploiting the old globe from day one
because another book, Genesis, says we have dominion over everything.
And the writers of Genesis, and the One who inspired
the man, men, women, to jot it all down for us, would they have written
anything differently today? 7 billion
strong we are, alive in the sixth extinction, we look a little different four thousand years later. And what is different aside from the obvious? That our ravenous exploitation of earth exacerbates the suffering of the poor.
I tell ya what I don’t like in this paragraph above is
the Church can, if it chooses to, modify the teaching. The Pope is the pope, modify, sure in
hindsight I guess some of the really lame butt popes had to be modified but six
hundred years ago the Pope was just a little nuttier and corrupt and was
something more than the leader of the church, so I beg forgiveness if
distinctions are made between these turkeys and the present pontiff. The encyclical we read this week cannot be
torn up and tossed aside. It cannot be
modified for a pluralistic population, it can’t. The legitimacy of this man rests in my belief, in my fallible opinion,
he communicates closer and more intimately with God than the rest of us.
The baby pigeons were born today and they look like
yellow stained cotton balls. Mother,
father take turns sitting on them. Soon
they will grow up to be ugly machine shitters.
What is their role again in the chain?
Are they food for anyone, cats can’t catch them. There ain’t no dogs around here. I rarely see falcons or hawks. The birds don’t eat insects I see, if they
could they’d be eating the cockroaches that are multiplying in my kitchen and
they had to come in from outside.
I graded 32 final exams today, to horrors. No, the students didn’t do terribly bad, the
exam itself was chockful of erroneous errors and complicated irrelevant questions
and I left the office begging anyone for high blood pressure medicine. Three hours later I still have a
headache. I made the right decision to
resign. Even if for some unknown reason I
don’t get on a plane and fly two hours north of here in five weeks time, I won’t
miss this nuthouse. This is what happens when an ‘English dept’ doesn’t have a
testing committee, this is what happens when someone whose English bulls are
full of grammar mistakes is allowed to cut and paste an exam worthy only under
the birds who nuzzle outside my glass window, surrounded by piles and piles of
dry shit, cigarette butts and a pigeon carcass.
If I spoke Spanish and worked in a Spanish department
do you think any native Spanish speakers would let me get away with the kinds
of mistakes I had to endure in today’s exam marking? The students, poor kids, not only is the exam
hard, but questions are written so badly, they begin to doubt their ability
though they shouldn’t be doubting their ability. I feel bad for them. Hey!
Students, I’m behind you, I’ll fight for your rights until it’s time to
stop fighting.
Goodness, I’d like to go to bed now and it’s not even eight.

No comments:
Post a Comment